Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, each of the above penalties shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the owner of H apartment house 401 in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, who was in office as a director of the G reconstruction housing association located in the Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City from February 12, 2003 to October 15, 2012 and who was in office as the head of the above association from October 16, 2012, and Defendant B has a claim against the above association.
It is the claimant.
On December 27, 2012, upon the application of Samsung Card Co., Ltd., the Defendants commenced the compulsory real estate auction procedure with the Seoul Central District Court I around December 27, 2012, and the new credit card Co., Ltd. filed an application for the compulsory real estate auction procedure with the Seoul Central District Court on January 15, 2013, the Defendants decided to acquire dividends by filing an application for the registration of the establishment of the right and demand for distribution with respect to the above apartment as if Defendant B had a claim of KRW 300 million against Defendant A, the obligor A, Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant B, and then filed an application for the registration of the establishment of the right and demand for distribution, and completed the registration of the establishment of the right and demand for distribution on March 6, 2013.
After that, on March 18, 2013, Defendant B submitted a report on the right and a request for distribution of the above contents of the collective security agreement to an employee in charge of civil execution and name in the Seoul Central District Court, which was located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, on civil execution and an employee in charge of civil execution, “B has a claim for loans of KRW 300 million in total amount of principal and interest to A on March 22, 201,” and submitted a copy of the collective security agreement as a document attached thereto.
However, in fact, Defendant B did not lend money to Defendant A on March 22, 201 to the sum of KRW 300 million.