beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. The Defendant who interfered with auction is a de facto marital relationship with C, the representative director of the Bank B, and was living together from October 200 to around October 2012, at least in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and filed a compulsory application for auction on the instant apartment based on the claim for damages of KRW 5.1 billion against C, the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation, the bankruptcy officer of the Bank B, Inc., made a compulsory application for auction on January 15, 2015, and the auction procedure was initiated by the Seoul Central District Court on January 15, 2015, the Defendant was willing to receive dividends by reporting the right based on the pretending that the lease deposit was refunded to C.
On April 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the auction office of the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court 21, the Seoul Central District Court 157 Seoul Central District Court 21, and (b) at the auction office of the Seoul Central District Court 20 million Seoul Central District Court 201, the Defendant provided that “an application for report on the right and demand for distribution” provided that he leased the apartment of this case in the “application for report on the right and demand for distribution of the right,” and submitted in advance a lease agreement entered into on September 20, 200, to a location auction employee, along with the lease agreement entered into on September 20, 200.
Therefore, the defendant has harmed the fairness of auction by fraudulent means.
2. On July 1, 2016, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud, at the civil petition office of the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul, and even though there was no fact that he paid KRW 350 million to C as stated in paragraph (1), and paid KRW 350,000 to the victim G who purchased the instant apartment at auction, the Defendant submitted a complaint to pay KRW 350,000,000 to the victim G who purchased the instant apartment at auction, and submitted the complaint to pay KRW 350,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000