Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, by a fine of KRW 4 million, by a fine of KRW 3 million, and by a fine of KRW 3 million.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On January 15, 2017, the Defendant, at around 20:30, 2017, expressed that “F” operated by the victim E in the Gu, would be drunk, and the Defendant was able to breadd the next opening to “Chewing flasing, flasing,” and that the Defendant was fladding the victim who met the flasing, “hinging a singingly, flasing a large amount of money, and flasing a small amount of money once within this time.” The Defendant was flad with a disturbance on the floor, such as flasing three times the flassing of the flass on the floor.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

B. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the same time, at the same place as the preceding paragraph, and at the same time, at the same time and place, and at the same time as the Defendant reported by 112 that the Defendant avoided the Defendant’s disturbance, and the chief of the police box belonging to the Jindo Police Station Gmp that was called out, prevented the Defendant from committing the Defendant’s disturbance, booming the H’s breath by breath, and assaulted the H by walking the Defendant at the right end.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report handling duties.

2. Defendant B, at the same time, and at the same place as indicated in Defendant B’s paragraph (a) as indicated in the said 112 report, recommended that the security guards belonging to the Jininina Police Station G (a police box) dispatched after receiving the said 112 report move out of the main station, he saw her to read “I Chewing, Chewing, immediately, and Ha,” and assaulted the victim by walking the back part of the back depth of the victim at several times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report handling duties.

3. Defendant C, on the same date and time, at the same place as the description in paragraph 1-A, and on the grounds of paragraph 2, Defendant C, as the two hand, tried to arrest Defendant C B, who is the Defendant’s daily behavior, as an offender of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties, and went beyond the floor by cutting down I’s flab and sculing.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. E, .