beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant A, around 01:35 on August 14, 2014, 201, at the top of the main line of the 201:01:35, Defendant A, “A” sent a police officer assistant H (54 years old), who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report 112, arrested him as a flagrant offender and arrested him on the ground as above, and taken him into the patrol room, and she saw the above H as “A Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YYY YY YYY YYYYYY YYYY Y YY
As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, damaged the divesity of trees that require treatment for about two weeks.
"2014 Highest 6033"
1. On June 29, 2014, around 08:20 on June 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) avoided disturbance, such as destroying the beer’s disease in front of the singing room located in Incheon Nam-gu, Incheon; (b) obstructed the lawful performance of duties by the police officer on the handling of reports and maintenance of public order and handling of reports by the police officer 112, who was sent to the Incheon Southern Police Station: (c) 112, who was reported and sent to the police officer, who was a police officer of the Incheon Southern Police Station: (d) taken away the beer’s sculptures of the beer’s disease; and (d) took the beer’s own desire to take the beer’s chest; and (e) interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officer on the 112-day handling of reports
2. When intending to go to the above A at the above date, time, and place, the Defendant 2 obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties on the handling of the report and the maintenance of public order, etc. by walking the 112 police officer on one occasion, and walking the boat of the police officer assigned to the K Police Station, the police officer belonging to the K Police Station, who was called to the above, to go to the above A. The Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s lawful performance of duties on the handling of the report and the maintenance of public order.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police officer with respect to H, M and L.