logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.07.18 2018고단4060
사기등
Text

Defendant

A and D Each fine of KRW 4 million, KRW 2 million, and KRW 3 million for Defendant B, and KRW 3 million for Defendant C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and B are persons engaged in the sales of used cars in the “F” company located in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E.

The Defendants posted an advertisement on the “G” website to sell a vehicle, etc. that is not owned as an actual article to the “H” account, and conspired to obtain the difference by allowing the Defendant C to provide telephone counseling and to purchase the vehicle explanation and written contract through counseling and mutual agreement, through the agreement between the Defendant A and B, when the Defendant D communicates the said advertisement to the mobile phone (I) used by the Defendant D for the business purpose that the damaged party uses.

1. No motor vehicle dealer who violates the Motor Vehicle Management Act shall make a false or exaggerated indication or advertisement on a motor vehicle in which he/she intends to sell or arrange the trade;

Nevertheless, on November 2017, the Defendants conspired and advertised as if they were able to secure and sell the Jystren-to-motor vehicle, etc., which did not hold as real objects, by accessing the said F Office’s “G” online, from the said F Office, as if they were to have been sold.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false advertisement on a motor vehicle intended to trade or arrange the sale or purchase.

2. The Defendants conspired to acquire the property from the injured party by using the so-called so-called baits as above.

Accordingly, on November 6, 2017, Defendant D sent the Internet site of the above “G,” and explained that Defendant C would have the victim’s contact address posted by the J K in order to purchase the above rocketing vehicles, and received the phone, and Defendant C would have the victim purchase it more than 200 to 30 million won than other locations, and then, Defendant C would have the victim purchase it well.

arrow