1. The Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of an additional injury or disease against the Plaintiff on August 25, 2015 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff received medical care until February 28, 2015 with the approval of the medical care benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act due to the occupational accident that occurred on October 2, 2014 (hereinafter the instant accident)’s injury of “the 2,3 metratium 2,3, and the 1st left-hand simplatium” (hereinafter the instant approved injury”).

B. On August 11, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits for an additional injury and disease with respect to “the instant additional injury and disease” (hereinafter “the instant additional injury and disease”), but the Defendant deemed that the instant additional injury and disease were irrelevant to the instant recognition and the instant accident and rendered a disposition not to approve the said application (hereinafter the instant disposition) on August 25, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. Since the Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant additional injury and disease occurred due to the instant accident, the instant disposition that rejected the application for medical care benefits for the additional injury and disease was unlawful.

B. On October 2, 2014, the Plaintiff suffered an accident of this case, where the weight of 30 kilograms of ice ice ice was removed from the ground above a fixed device, and the left-hand edge was exposed to the accident. 2) The Plaintiff’s treatment following the instant accident, immediately after the Plaintiff’s occurrence of stroke and stroke in the left-hand stroke, and the left-hand 2 centimeters of stroke in the upper-hand stroke. On the day of the accident, the Plaintiff was admitted to the stroke hospital emergency room, and was admitted to a degree of education at the scoke hospital. On October 14, 2014, the Plaintiff taken MaI on the day of the accident, and received the diagnosis of the stroke in the strokestroke, the stroke, the stroke, the stroke, the stroke, and the Plaintiff continued to receive the stroke 18 14.

After that, on July 13, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed of the instant additional injury and disease as a result of the pain test, records test, MIM photographing, etc. of the left-hand part at the E Hospital.

3. Medical treatment.