1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 2, 2014, the Plaintiff suffered an accident where the ice sckeer, who had ice during the preparation work for flight, was on the floor leveled more than a fixed device and the left-hand light of the Plaintiff’s crew, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. On November 3, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for approval of medical care on the ground that the 1st unit of the 1st unit part of the 1st unit of the instant accident occurred, the 2nd unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit, the 3rd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit, and the 3rd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2014 unit of the 2nd unit of the 2014 unit of the 201st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 20

(hereinafter the Defendant’s injury and disease recognized by the Defendant’s medical care approval on November 7, 2014 (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”). C.

On March 30, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an additional application for an injury to the Defendant on the ground that a single pathal disease (the first application pathal disease between the two regions; hereinafter referred to as “the first application pathal disease”), the skin of the skin and the part under the part, and the part under the part, (the mathal disease in the instant case; hereinafter referred to as “second application 2”), and the part, the part, and the part, and the part, (the mathal disease in the instant case; hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant applications 1”). D.

On April 10, 2015, the Defendant issued a non-approval disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that all of the instant applicants’ disease and the instant injury and injury cannot be deemed to have a proximate causal relation with the instant accident or the instant existing injury and injury and injury.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was hospitalized at the hospital from October 15, 2014 to November 8, 2014 due to the instant accident, and received each medical treatment thereafter.

However, the plaintiff is around February 2015.