(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.04.24 2014고합632

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.04.24 2014고합632

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(주거침입강간등)등

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant charged with this case is the director-general of the Busan District Office and the director-general of the Busan District Office, and the victim D (the age of 29) is the contractual teacher belonging to the C Company's Busan District Office.

1. On February 2, 2013, at around 02:00, the Defendant got into the house of the victim in Busan Jin-gu 2013, about 3 Dong 504, Busan, and had been in the house of the victim, and had been in accordance with the mouth that he would drink with the victim before drinking alcohol and bring the female into the house of the victim, and had her entrance into the house in order for the victim to enter the house of the house, he she saw the entrance, "to write the toilet," "to write the toilet," and into the house, and had the victim interfered with each other by cutting the victim into the house, cutting down the body, cutting down the body, and breaking the part of the woman's clothes, and sexual intercourse.

2. At around 03:00 on May 1, 2013, the Defendant, along with the place described in paragraph 1, 2013, brought the victim under drinking alcohol to the place where he was her home, she did not come back with other male movement fees, she did not go back to home, and she did so. The victim, who was suffering from drinking, opened a door to confirm that there is no other person in the house, and then confirmed that there is no other person in the house, and then “Neas, she path, fright, and frighted the victim,” and then she committed an indecent act by force against the victim.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion was not a temporary border as stated in paragraph (1) of the facts charged, but a statement was made within the victim’s home with the victim’s consent in January 2013, and there was no other fact that the Defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim.

In addition, there is no fact between the defendant and the victim's house at the time stated in paragraph (2) of the facts charged.

3. As evidence that conforms to the facts charged in the instant case, D’s investigative agency and this court’s statements are virtually flexible.

Each police interrogation protocol against the accused was not adopted as evidence, and a record of recording has not been adopted.

유사 판례

-부산고등법원 2015.07.15 2015노264

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.28 2019고정2347

-부산지방법원 2015.06.05 2014고합873

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.11.08 2018고합134

-창원지방법원 2018.01.11 2017노2090