The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged of the instant case, intrusion upon residence.

1. The decision of the court below that found the defendant guilty on the basis of each of the statements made by the witness D (victim) and E (the husband and witness of the victim) although the defendant had no intention to intrude into the residence, and committed assault, and all of the facts charged are erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged (1) around September 24, 2016, at around 19:30, the Defendant sought a her husband’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her husband

The Defendant has opened a entrance in the house in the first class sound, and whether the victim has been “Isson’s day.”

In the case of the question, the question is that the pregnant woman would not be fluencing with his husband, and her husband will be fluencing with his husband.

‘Isson’ while doing so

“The victim was frightened by entering the house entrance of the victim who was frightened with his hand to the left-hand shoulder.”

(2) The Defendant entered the above date, time, and place with the victim D’s house entrance without permission, and intruded on the residence.

B. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the following facts are acknowledged.

(1) On September 24, 2016, the Defendant was found to have known that her husband had been married with her husband for three years prior to her husband’s marriage through the Kakao Stockholm message and the husband’s horse, thereby falling into a large shock. In order to verify whether her husband was true, the Defendant was found to have discovered that her husband was the victim’s residence around 19:30.

(2) The Defendant became aware of the above apartment through the birth, and the apartment security guards have objects to transfer to the victim.

C. (3) The defendant, who was aware of the initial apartment type, was in the apartment complex, and was aware of the "H's denial".

The term "victim" means a case used by a defendant in order to open the entrance door.