Seoul High Court 2010Nu26799 (Law No. 19, 2011)

early 2008 Heavy008 (2009.04.03)

(C) No sales may be deemed to have been excessively appropriated in connection with the creative construction, etc.

In light of the fact that there was no argument or materials about excessive appropriation of processed sales in the appeal procedure or in the administrative appeal procedure, it is difficult to believe this, and the personnel expenses for employees are not recognized.

2011Du14753 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing Corporate Tax, etc.

SP industry

O Head of tax office

Seoul High Court Decision 2010Nu26799 Decided May 19, 201

The appeal is dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Since there is no statement in the grounds of appeal in the petition of appeal, and there is no statement in the grounds of appeal within the statutory period (the grounds of appeal filed by appellant was received on July 27, 201), it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, Article 429 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Article 5 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure of Final Trials.

Reference materials.

If the grounds of final appeal are not included in the grounds of final appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of trial without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal, and refers to the system of dismissal of final appeal by judgment without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal (see this case, e.g.,