The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the substance of the grounds for appeal of this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is recognized to have led to the confession of the crime of this case and against the defendant, but the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of two years and six months for the crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul East Eastern District Court on February 13, 2007 and started to commit the crime of this case at the same five days from the date he was released without being released from the criminal despite the completion of the punishment on May 23, 2009. The defendant, other than the defendant, has the records of punishment four times for the same crime, and the phiphonephonephonephone dealt with by the defendant has a large amount of 15.13 grams and all the sentencing conditions, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.