1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 11, 2015, around 02:16, the Defendant cut off the victim D’s “E shooting range” way in front of the “E shooting range” operated by the victim in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, by reducing the gap between the victim-owned market value of KRW 20,000,000, which is located in the front sales stand of the said shooting range and the victim-owned one, who is a victim-owned one.

2. On May 10, 2015, around 01:14, at the same place as that of paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant stolen a person-type 1,00 won of the market price, which is the victim’s possession, displayed at the sales stand, by means of a reduction of the amount of 10,000 won.

3. On September 19, 2015, the Defendant, at the same place as around 02:12 on September 19, 2015, tried to steal by having a 20,000 won or more of the market price, which is the victim’s possession, displayed in the sales stand, and attempted to do so, but the Defendant was aware of the type of the said rash and the instant rash to move to another place, and whether “hing with a person with a penalty without paying any money.”

When receiving a claim to the effect that “,” the type of the person who was demoted was left in the place of sale and did not achieve that intent, but did not receive such an attempt.

4. On September 19, 2015, the Defendant was requested to present an identification card for the purpose of inquiry on the ground that the Defendant was similar to the appearance of the thief, such as the appearance of the thief, as described in the preceding paragraph, from I, a police officer (police officer) belonging to the Seodaemun Police Station, Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, who was dispatched after receiving a report on the crime of larceny, as described in the preceding paragraph, at around 02:20 on September 19, 2015, on the ground that he was in the same way as the appearance of the thief, such as

Chewing, we see in order to see. . . ..." The 112 police officers' legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and criminal investigations by assaulting I, such as scam part of I with the right hand, scam part of I, and scambling two times by hand, etc.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment Nos. 1, 2, and 3]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. D. D.