beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 241,738,103 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from July 30, 2015 to November 10, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is an insurance company that entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff, with the Plaintiff, with respect to the ABW vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”), which is a corporate office-based vehicle of the said company, and the Defendant is an insurance company that entered into the automobile insurance contract with the B Operation C vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant 1”) and the D Driving E-H vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant 2”).
B. A traffic accident occurred (1) around 07:10 on May 7, 2013, F driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle and proceeded to the private distance at the entrance of the Doro 1-dong office at the Han River basin at the Han River basin at the Han River basin.
The location is a remote intersection where the traffic of vehicles is frequent, and a crosswalk is installed in the front section.
F, however, while proceeding a two-lanes in the five-lanes, the line was changed to the right side (three-lanes if the two-lanes are marked into the two-lanes) without examining the right side and the right side in the intersection (in the intersection, there is no difference between the two-lanes) and the two-lanes in front of the left side of Defendant 1, who is running on the right side at the time.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant primary accident”). (2) Accordingly, Defendant 1’s vehicle is sealed to the right side (four-lanes if it is marked to the right side) and conflict with Defendant 2’s front and rear parts of the D Driving, which is proceeding on the right side at the time, into the right side and rear parts.
(hereinafter “instant secondary accident”). (3) If D marks Defendant 2’s vehicle on the right-hand side with the direction, the five-lanes elapsed, and the victim G’s body part in order to build the crosswalk was used as the front part of Defendant 2’s vehicle, and the head part was used as the front part of Defendant 2’s body part.
(4) The victim G functions as an incurable brain for treatment days due to the third accident of this case.