1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 11, 2015, the deceased C (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) was admitted to an emergency room of the F Hospital located in Chang-si E in Chang-si E in a state of unknown consciousness at his own home on July 11, 2015, and was hospitalized in the said hospital due to brain flachising symptoms, and was hospitalized in the said hospital, resulting in the neutism and rehabilitation medical treatment.

B. On August 21, 2015, the Deceased transferred the deceased to the Masa rehabilitation hospital (hereinafter “the Defendant hospital”) in Changwon-si, Changwon-dong 2, the Defendant’s operation. At the time of the transfer, the Deceased showed Masae and cerebral typhism symptoms, and the two-stage bath (3 x 3 cm) took place on the bones of the sagic body (3 x cm).

C. After September 21, 2015, the Deceased transferred to the H Hospital located in Yongsan-si G in Changwon-si, Changwon-si. At the time of the transfer, the said bathing was aggravated to four stages (7 x 8 cm).

On October 20, 2015, the Deceased died at H Hospital. The cause of the Deceased’s death in the medical certificate of diagnosis is the suspension of low blood pressure caused by blood pressure and cardiopulmonary pulmonary resuscitation.

E. The Plaintiffs are the deceased’s children.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap 1, 4-6 evidence (including a branch number) and images, the result of the commission of the examination of medical records to the director of the Japanese University Busan Hospital, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Although the Plaintiff’s assertion had already been taken place when the deceased transferred to the Defendant hospital, the symptoms have deteriorated due to the Defendant hospital’s failure for the Defendant hospital to properly treat or nurse for a bath, and the deceased died therefrom.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay 30 million won each as consolation money to the plaintiffs, who are the deceased's children.

3. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed as above, the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the medical personnel of the defendant hospital was at fault as alleged by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit without examining the remainder of the issue.

First, .