logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2015.11.20 2014고단425
무고등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 425]

1. On July 18, 2012, while serving as an employee in G with E 2nd floor F, the Defendant filed a complaint from H on charges of fraud, fabrication of private documents, and uttering of a falsified document. The police officer C belonging to the I police station who was in charge of the instant case at the time sent the instant case to the effect that the suspected suspicion is recognized as a result of investigation, and after obtaining approval from the Inspector JJ and the Director KK, sent the official question in the name of the chief of the I police station lawfully prepared to I and notify the fact of the instant G’s violation of the law.

Accordingly, the Defendant is likely to be subject to administrative disposition such as the suspension of business against the above G, and the Defendant was able to raise C with respect to the fact that C prepared the above official document individually without the approval of his superior official, forged the official document, sent it for viewing, and used the forged official document.

On November 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) prepared a written petition stating false facts to the effect that “A4, with the intention of having C subject to criminal punishment or disciplinary action; (b) sent to the Prime Minister on the same day on November 15, 2012, the Defendant sent to the G Office a written petition stating that “AD’s official document without the consent of the superior official was sent by using individual power and position; and (c) received it to the Prime Minister’s office on the same day.”

B. On January 21, 2013, for the purpose of having C punished or disciplinary action against the above office, the Defendant written a petition stating that “A sent a personal official door without the signature of the fraternity, the chief of the department, etc., and the viewing employee deemed that there was no answer, and that C’s act of causing the ordinary people to die due to the crime of personal abduction itself is in violation of the Police Act, the disciplinary action shall be taken if it is a violation of the Police Act,” and then sent by mail on the same day to the National Police Agency around January 28, 2013.

This is the defendant.

arrow