logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.08.11 2014고정1178
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a member of the “C urban environment rearrangement project partnership,” comprised of 369 members, with approximately 17,715 members of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B as a project site, and the executive branch, including D, including the president, of the partnership, does not represent the interests of the association members, and is responsible for organizing a committee for rights and interests of the association members and joint representatives.

Around January 2, 2013, the Defendant convened an extraordinary general meeting of union members with E, an adviser of the Civil Rights and Interests Committee; and around February 15, 2013, after convening an extraordinary general meeting of union members with respect to the agenda on which nine executive officers of the executive branch of the association, including D, including the president of the association, were removed; and on February 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the extraordinary general meeting of association members held at Young-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 7:5; (b) the facts were 49 members directly attended the said extraordinary general meeting; and (c) 33 members overlapping with the above 49 members present at the general meeting; (d) notified the above 117 members who were present at the general meeting and were removed from office; and (e) notified the above 184 members who were present at the general meeting, and (e) notified the association’s office of dismissal and management of the executive officers including the head of the association of Yeongdeungpo-gu, 234.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with E to spread false facts, thereby hindering the management of the victim D, the president of the partnership.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused, F, and G;

1.Each of D. D.

arrow