Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000,000,000,000,00

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head of the partnership of the housing redevelopment project association in the CB promotion zone, and the defendant B was the general director of the partnership.

An executive of a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association shall disclose the documents and related data prescribed by the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes in parallel with the Internet and other methods so that the association members or landowners can know about the implementation of the rearrangement project, and shall comply with such request within 15 days at the request of the association members or landowners.

1. Around January 3, 2013, the Defendants refused to demand perusal and reproduction of documents around December 21, 2012, were certified as follows: “Around December 21, 2012, at the Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association Office in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Housing Development and Improvement Project Association Office for the Housing Improvement and Improvement Project in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Housing Improvement Project Zone, the Defendants were certified as having “the request for perusal and reproduction of a written resolution regarding the dismissal agenda of the Plaintiff F, E, and Auditor’s special general meeting

However, on January 3, 2013, the Defendants conspired to refuse the request for inspection and copying of the above written resolution without any justifiable reason.

2. The Defendants refusing to demand perusal and copying around January 21, 2013, among the minutes of the board of directors of the 49th board of directors as of August 22, 2012, from the members E at the above partnership office around January 8, 2013, the Defendants’ refusal to demand perusal and copying on or around January 21, 2013.

C. Of the agenda items, subparagraph 3 agenda items, and the dismissal agenda items of the partnership executives, the Defendants were verified with the content that “the request for perusal and copying of a list of persons proposing the motion to propose the motion to dismiss some executives and employees.” However, on January 21, 2013, the Defendants conspired to refuse the request for perusal and copying of the list of persons proposing the above motion without justifiable grounds. On February 5, 2013, the Defendants refused the request for perusal and copying of the list of persons proposing the motion to submit the motion. On January 24, 2013, the Defendants were served with proof of the content that “the request for perusal and copying of the written resolution from June 27, 2009 to September 27, 2012,” from E, at the above partnership office.

However, the Defendants conspired to act on February 5, 2013 and justifiable reasons.