Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

A or B fails to pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Where a fishery right holder intends to use a fishing vessel necessary for controlling fishing ground of his/her fishery business, he/she shall be designated by the head of

Nevertheless, Defendant A, without being designated as a control vessel on January 18, 2010 from around 08:00 to December 12:00, 201, used O's shipment P (15 tons) for the purpose of the installation of a complex fish farm and the installation of seeds and seedlings transplantation work at the M fishing village complex complex (license number: N).

In addition, from January 18, 2010 to June 10, 2012, Defendant A used the above P for the purpose of the management of fishing grounds, such as the installation of a complex fish farm and the entry of seeds and seedlings, for which the management line was not designated more than ten times in total, as described in the attached list of crimes, in the same manner.

As a result, Defendant A used a ship not designated as a control vessel.

2. No fishery right holder with a designated control vessel shall use the control vessel for catching, gathering, or cultivating marine animals or plants on any waters other than the designated fishing ground area or the approved area;

Nevertheless, on January 18, 2010, from around 08:00 to 12:00, Defendant B used O P (15 tons) to catch or cultivate marine animals and plants in M fishing village multiple fish farms (license number: N) located in the area of waters other than the designated fishing ground area or the area of approval when the land was designated as the management line of the R (management vessel use certificate number S) complex fish farm in Q from March 18, 201.

In addition, from January 18, 2010 to June 10, 2010, Defendant B used the aforesaid P to capture or cultivate marine animals and plants in total ten times, such as the list of crimes in the attached list, from January 18, 2010 to June 10, 2010.

As a result, Defendant B was used on the waters other than the designated fishing ground area or the approved area.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A and B.