beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Daejeon High Court (Cheongju) 2012Nu424, 17 July 2013)
Title
(A) The tax invoice of this case is a tax invoice which is different from the fact that the supplier's entry is not true, and the plaintiff's good faith and negligence cannot be recognized.
Summary
(1) The Plaintiff’s each of the instant tax invoices to the effect that the Plaintiff received oil from each of the instant suppliers falls under a different tax invoice from the fact, and the Plaintiff’s good faith and negligence cannot be acknowledged.
Cases
2013Du1789. Revocation of revocation of the imposition of value-added tax
Plaintiff-Appellant
CHAPTER A
Defendant-Appellee
Head of Dong District Office
Judgment of the lower court
Daejeon High Court (Cheongju) Decision 2012Nu424 Decided July 17, 2013
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by