A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 21:00 on September 23, 2014, the Defendant, at the main point of “D” located in Sinpo City, Ma, 112, who received a report that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and solicited the Defendant to pay the drinking value to the Defendant and to return home to the Defendant by the Defendant, and when the Defendant was reported to the Defendant by the Hana Police Station E zone affiliated with the Mana Police Station E zone, and the Victim G was called as the victim at the above site where many unspecified customers visit, and the said site was reported to the said State E.W., the Defendant made a public insult of the victims by saying, “I am this Chewing typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ. I am. I am to this effect.”

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Crime Assault, etc.) and the obstruction of performance of official duties on September 23, 2014: (a) the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender for the same crime as described in paragraph (1) on the front and rear seat of the J Gyeong-si, and tried to assault the victim G (Nam, 31 years old) who was seated by the Defendant and was seated by the Defendant while moving to the E zone of the J Gyeong-si Police Station on September 23, 2014; (b) the victim G (Nam, 31 years old) was taken several times of the face of the victim by head; and (c) the Defendant assaulted the victim F (Nam, 45 years old), who continued to drive the said patrol vehicle on several occasions on September 23, 2014; and (d) continued to walk the victim E zone in K on September 23, 2014 with the view of assaulting the victim E zone.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted the Victim F, who is the driver of a vehicle in operation, at the same time interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning F's arrest of flagrant offender and suppression of crime, and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offender G and suppression of crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G and F;

1. A complaint filed by G or F;

1. A H statement;

1. Investigation report (verification of CCTV image data in the E District) and application of relevant photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The corresponding criminal provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime; and