logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.06.12 2013고단4638
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Around April 2013, Defendant A received a proposal from Defendant B to offer four million won per week by filing a false report of marriage with Defendant B, and agreed to enter the F in his family relation certificate, etc. so that he can stay in Korea.

Defendant

A received from Defendant B the marriage requirement certificate, lease contract, etc., which is necessary for filing a marriage report, and around 15:00 on May 28, 2013, at the HMyeon Office located in Gangnam-gun G, Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-do, the state of marriage was falsely prepared as if he/she were married with F in a false manner without the intention to marry with F, and the public official in charge of family registration was in charge of family registration affairs by submitting a certificate, etc., which is a requirement for marriage, and made the public official in charge of family registration enter and record the false fact that he/she and F were married in the marriage relation column of the family register information system, which is a public electronic record, and stored and operated a family register information system where the above content

As a result, the Defendants conspired with F and recorded false facts in the family register information system, which is a public electronic record, and exercised them.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the record of the instant case: ① the Defendants visited China twice from May 3, 2013 to June 27, 2013, namely, the following circumstances: (a) the Defendants came to know that they came to be a customer in the last place of Defendant B’s operation; (b) Defendant B offered that he would look at the F of the Chinese nationality of Defendant B, an unmarried Defendant A; and (c) Defendant A paid the F of the Chinese nationality of Defendant B, the amount of money from May 3, 2013 to May 9, 2013; and (d) Defendant A was unable to readily conclude that the said amount of money was the false marriage without the prosecutor’s consent, in light of the following: (a) the Defendants visited China on two occasions from June 23, 2013 to June 27, 2013; and (b) Nonparty B paid the said amount of money to Defendant A at least 200,000 won.

arrow