Seoul High Court 2010Nu667 (2010.09.01)

(Reorder of Hearing) It appears that the plaintiff corporation directly supplied to another corporation that is not the plaintiff corporation.

(Summary of the original trial) It seems that the representative director of the plaintiff is not directly supplied with Soben, but directly supplied by other corporations that are not the plaintiff.

2010du1959 Revocation of disposition of imposing corporate tax, etc.

SBK Co., Ltd.

Head of Yeongdeungpo Tax Office

Seoul High Court Decision 2010Nu667 Decided September 1, 2010

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

Reference materials.

If the grounds of final appeal are not included in the grounds of final appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of trial without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal, and refers to the system of dismissal of final appeal by judgment without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal (see this case, e.g.,