beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months and by imprisonment for four months, respectively.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant
A On August 25, 2017, the Ulsan District Court sentenced imprisonment for one year with prison labor for a crime of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (domain sentence) at the Ulsan District Court, which became final and conclusive on September 2, 2017.
1. Defendants’ collaborative act
A. Defendant A, in collusion with Defendant B, who had an interest on the same workplace rent, female-friendly job offers, in collusion with the electronic records, etc., used that Defendant A, a mobile phone agent in Jinju-si, operated from December 1, 2015, was accessible to personal information provided for normal subscription of mobile phones and used a false mobile phone to open a mobile phone and trade mobile phone devices with an intermediate device, etc. to acquire pecuniary benefits.
Defendants were customers of the aforementioned mobile phone agency at the immediately preceding mobile phone agency around January 18, 2016.
Along with LG Plus Sclub Program installed on a computer without authority for the purpose of facilitating administrative affairs by using a scamying H’s identification card, “A1586-64” was entered in the cell phone model column of the application for renewal of the service, and “H” was entered in the name column of the customer who applied for renewal of the service, and “H” was signed at will in the applicant column and signed in the applicant column, and sent one copy of the application for renewal under the name of another electronic records, which are electronic records pertaining to rights and duties, to the applicant column. The above written application for renewal was sent to LG Plus, Co., Ltd., Ltd., without knowledge of the fact as if the electronic records were duly prepared, and then the application for renewal was subsequently filed and renewed on 67 occasions from that time to September 13, 2016.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to write down a copy of another person's electronic recording of rights and duties and exercised it for the purpose of hindering the management of affairs.
(b) fraud;