1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff, Defendant C, E, and D are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. With respect to the scope of the judgment of this court, the court of first instance appealed part of the claim for damages against the defendant Eul (the defendant D and E, who is the wife, as co-inheritors due to the death of the court of first instance), and against the defendant C, the court of first instance has rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff as to the above part. The plaintiff appealed against the defendant Eul (the defendant C, D, E, and E, who are the wife, as co-inheritors) and the defendant C lost. In relation to the embezzlement of the above technology income portion, the court of first instance dismissed the claim for damages against the defendant E and F, but the court of first instance rejected it.

Therefore, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to ① the amount of technical income and the amount of money embezzled by the assignee and the defendant C, ② the claim for damages concerning the nominal defraudation, such as the benefits appealed by the assignee, ③ the claim for the amount equivalent to the interest on the loans against the defendant C and F that the plaintiff appealed.

2. Basic facts

가. 당사자의 관계 1) 원고는 플라스틱 제조 및 가공업 등을 목적으로 하는 법인으로서, 금호석유화학 주식회사 및 GS칼텍스 주식회사 등으로부터 공급받은 플라스틱 원부재료인 파우다, 펠렛 등을 플라스틱 자재로 가공하여 위 회사들이 지정하는 업체에 납품하고 임가공료를 받는 방법으로 수익을 창출하는 회사(이하 ‘원고 회사’라고도 칭한다

2) 2).