logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.03.20 2017나2001941
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff in the judgment of the first instance, including a claim for change, extension or reduction by this court.

Reasons

1. Scope of the judgment of this court;

A. In the first instance court, the Plaintiffs filed a claim for damages against Defendant H, J, K, and P on the ground of joint tort; ② Defendant H’s claim for the return of loans from Defendant D and G on behalf of Defendant H on behalf of Defendant H on behalf of Defendant H on the part of Co-Defendant Incorporated Incorporated Incorporated Co-Defendant D (hereinafter “D”); ③ DefendantO’s claim for the return of loans from Defendant H on behalf of Defendant H on behalf of Defendant H on the part of the latter; ③ DefendantO’s claim for the return of the down payment and the intermediate payment against DefendantO on the part of Company A, AD (hereinafter “AG”); ④ Defendant H and Z’s affiliated companies (hereinafter “C”), E, E, “E,” and “F” with respect to Co-Defendant L of the first instance court.

(b) a claim for restitution of money was made on behalf of the person concerned; hereinafter the same shall apply).

In addition, Plaintiff A filed a claim for damages against Co-Defendant C, E, and F due to a corporation’s tort liability with respect to the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment with respect to the Co-Defendant C, E, and F, a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment with respect to the Co-Defendant C, a stock company (hereinafter “AF”), a claim for restitution with Defendant H for joint tort with respect to Co-Defendant I of the first instance trial, a claim for restitution of investment amount, a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment, a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment with respect to Defendant H or Z affiliated companies in subrogation of Defendant H or Z affiliated companies, and ④ Co-Defendant Q, Inc., Ltd. of the first instance trial and R

B. Accordingly, the first instance court dismissed both the plaintiffs' lawsuits against D, G, L, and defendantO and the plaintiff's lawsuits against M and N, and sentenced the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant H, J, K, and P and the plaintiff's claims against C, E, F, I, Q, and R to all of them.

C. Meanwhile, among the 105 designated parties who selected Plaintiff A from the first instance court as the designated parties, three of the 105 designated parties listed in the attached list No. 1 were also appointed by this court as the designated parties, and the 61 of the attached list No. 2 changed the designated parties to Plaintiff EF, and the rest of the designated parties.

arrow