logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.12.15 2015가단132887
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 35,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from June 17, 2015 to December 15, 2016, and the following.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff was awarded a contract for the construction of a new building with the following content from the Defendant:

(1) The name of the construction project under the contract made on February 9, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “first contract”): The D construction period from February 9, 2015 to March 31, 2015: Value-added tax of KRW 110,00,000: Value-added tax of KRW 100,000: 60% of the down payment after concluding the contract for the payment of KRW 10,000,000, KRW 60,000, KRW 300, KRW 000, KRW 300, KRW 000, KRW 000, KRW 100, KRW 000, KRW 100, KRW 000, KRW 000, KRW 1000, KRW 000, KRW 1000, KRW 000, KRW 1000, KRW 000, KRW 1000, KRW 21,25,2015.

B. The Plaintiff completed the construction under the contract No. 1 within the construction period, and completed the steel frame and the board board construction among the construction works under the contract No. 2 until April 2015.

C. The Defendant paid all the construction cost under the first contract to the Plaintiff, and paid KRW 55,00,000 among the construction cost under the second contract.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3 evidence, Eul 1 and 2 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the parties’ assertion

A. According to the contract 2 of the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Defendant paid KRW 90,000,000, which is 90% of the construction contract amount after the completion of the steel frame and the team construction work, to the Plaintiff’s assertion, only KRW 55,00,000 among them.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to perform the reinforcement works for the buildings constructed separately from the above contract, and paid KRW 5,00,000 at the expense of the Plaintiff.

The construction work is suspended due to the failure of the Defendant to pay the construction cost and thus the Plaintiff manages the construction site.

arrow