The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (2.5 million won in penalty) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The crime of arranging sexual traffic in this case is a situation unfavorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's act of arranging sexual traffic in B using mobile phones several times, and the fact that the defendant has been punished for committing the crime of violating the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant is against his mistake and the defendant is punished for the crime of sexual traffic brokerage or has no record of punishment exceeding the fine before the crime of this case is committed is favorable to the defendant.

Considering all of the above circumstances and other conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, it is difficult to deem that the lower court’s punishment is too unfasible and unfair.

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.