The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence (7 million won in penalty) that the court below rendered by the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal is deemed to be too unhutiled and unfair.

2. The Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had been punished by a fine for the same kind of crime during the period of repeated crime of the instant crime, is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant repents and reflects his mistake, and that there was no record of punishment exceeding the fine for the same kind of crime before the crime of this case, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

In addition, when comprehensively taking into account all of the sentencing conditions in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background and background of the crime, gains from the actual acquisition of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the equity with the case of a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts in the holding of the lower judgment, which became final and conclusive, the lower court’s punishment is too una

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.