logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.02.08 2016노4495
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one year of imprisonment, additional collection of KRW 42,270,200) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination is a favorable circumstance that the defendant properly recognizes and reflects his or her mistake, and that the defendant seems to have been under the circumstances in which he or she must support his or her married, etc.

On the other hand, the crime of arranging sexual traffic in this case requires strict punishment as to the commercialization of women's sex and harm sound sexual culture and good morals. In particular, the defendant has been punished three times, including suspended execution of the same kind of crime, and the defendant is not short of the period of engaging in sexual traffic brokerage business, and it seems that the amount of profits acquired by this is not significant.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or it is not deemed unfair as it is too heavy, and thus, the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow