1. The Defendants jointly share 270,703,626 won, Plaintiff B, C, D, and E respectively, and each of the said money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

가. 인정사실 1) G은 2013. 9. 29. 21:15경 H 마티즈 승용차를 운전하여 광주 광산구 I에 있는 ‘J’ 사거리 교차로를 평동역 쪽에서 낙원가든 쪽으로 직진 통행하던 중 위 사거리 교차로를 1번로 입구 쪽에서 송오당가든 쪽으로 직진 통행하는 피고 F 운전의 K 렉스턴 승용차의 왼쪽 앞 휀다 부분을 위 마티즈 스용차 앞 범퍼 부분으로 들이받아, 위 렉스턴 승용차가 오른쪽으로 튕겨나가면서 전신주를 충격하도록 하여, 위 렉스턴 승용차에 동승하고 있던 원고 A에게 외상성 경막하출혈 등의 상해를 입게 하였다(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라고 한다

(2) Defendant Music Co., Ltd. is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract for the said Bosch Rexton car, and the said Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. is an insurer who has entered into an automobile liability insurance contract for the said M& car.

3) Plaintiffs B, C, D, and E are Plaintiff’s own consciousness. [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, and 3 (each description and image of each number including each number)

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the Defendants jointly and severally are liable to compensate the Plaintiffs for damages arising from the instant accident under Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act or Article 724 of the Commercial Act.

C. According to the statement and video of the evidence No. 31 to 41 of the limitation on liability, it can be recognized that the above Bosch Rexton’s car was shocked to the right side of the telegraph and damaged by the shape where the telegraph was displayed to the inside and the part was entered. In light of such circumstances, it is difficult to recognize that Plaintiff A did not fasten the safety belt on the ground that Plaintiff A was faced with the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body.

Plaintiff

Even if A was accompanied by the vehicle of Defendant F driver, who is the branch of A, the latter.