logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.07.04 2013고단2002
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of each of the above penalties shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is engaged in driving C 124cc, and Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving D 124cc.

1. At around 07:20 on February 19, 2013, Defendant A, driving C 124cc A and driving a two-lane road in the northwest-dong of Ulsan Metropolitan City, at a speed of about 50 kilometers per hour, from the 5-lane off the eth of Hyundai Motor Vehicle at a speed of about 50 kilometers per hour, Defendant A was under the occupational negligence of playing a central line among both lanes, while driving a safety zone installed at a width of about 2 meters for safety purposes in order to ensure the safety of the vehicle as soon as possible, and driving D 124cc-camba in front of the victim B (Seoul, 26 years old) driving along the safety zone at the eth of the ethmabbba, and caused the victim B to open the safety zone for about 5 weeks in order to ensure the safety of the vehicle.

2. Defendant B, at the same date and time as above, driven D 124cc Oral c., driving D 124cc. in Hyundai Motor Vehicle 5 Factory, was in progress at a speed of about 60 kilometers per hour in the speed of 50 c. Defendant B’s occupational negligence, playing a central line on both lanes, while driving a safety zone, which is a place where traffic is prohibited by approximately 2 meters wide for safety purposes, for safety purposes, in order to speed up the vehicle as soon as possible. Defendant B, at the same time and place as above 124cc. c. of the victim A (Nam, 28 years old), who was proceeding as the safety zone at the time and place where the traffic is prohibited by approximately 2 meters for safety, conflicted with the 124cc c. of the victim A (Seoul, and 28 years old) who was proceeding as the safety zone at the end of about 6 weeks.

3. The Defendants’ co-principal negligence in the course of the safety zone, which is the place where traffic is prohibited, at the same time and at the same place as above, and as seen above, the Defendants suffered injury to the victim E (Nam, 26 years old) who was on the part of Defendant B, due to their collision, due to approximately 16 weeks of treatment.

arrow