logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.26 2013가합558071
손해배상
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) to Plaintiff A Co., Ltd., KRW 52,568,707; (b) KRW 3,239,403; and (c) to each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status of the parties 1) Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “A”)

(2) The lower court determined that the Defendant (former trade name was “D Co., Ltd.” but changed as of October 1, 2014) is a corporation that runs an investment trading business, investment brokerage business, collective investment business, investment advisory business, discretionary investment business, and trust business prescribed by the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (hereinafter “Capital Markets Act”).

E is the head of the Defendant’s branch office, and F is the employee of the same branch office.

B. On January 5, 2011, Plaintiff A’s financial product transaction 1) the Defendant’s Ulsan Branch (hereinafter “instant branch”) on January 5, 201.

() In the “G asset management passbook CMA-RP account” account and consignment account opened and invested in the financial product, as indicated in [Attachment 1], the Defendant invested in the financial product as indicated in [Attachment 1] [Attachment 1] / The date of issuance of the name of the product / the principal of the investment maturity deposit principal (won) 1 H short-term electronic bond trust 3025 on July 5, 2013, 200, 2002 H short-term electronic bond trust 3049 on August 9, 2013 and 200,000 on July 89, 2013, 2013], the Plaintiff opened the financial product and indicated in the consignment account in the financial product / [Attachment 1] as indicated in the trust account in the financial product / [Plaintiff 20,000,000 on August 9, 2013].

(B) (Attachment 1) and [Attachment 2] . [Attachment 2] . [Attachment 2] / The date of issuance of each of the instant financial instruments, including the financial instruments listed in Table 2] . / The names of the products / The term of validity 3 ICP trust 4510 on April 30, 2013, 50,000 on April 30, 2013// October 180 on April 29, 2013 / The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition / The facts described in Table 1 through 3, Nos. 7, 8, and 12 (including the number of pages; hereinafter the same shall apply), each of the statements stated in Table 2, each of the entire arguments, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. 1 Defendant’s tort claim for damages caused by tort.

arrow