logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.04.21 2016고정185
모욕
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 28, 2015, at around 19:00, the Defendant provided meals to “D” apartment units in “C cafeteria B” located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, with ten persons, including the Dong representative of “D” apartment units, and took a bath at a mixed level while considering that E, the Dong representative of the same apartment unit, and F, the Dong representative chairperson, the Dong representative of the Dong representative of the Dong representative of the apartment unit, discussed the debate about the performance of duties for one year in the same apartment units.

The Defendant stated that “A large number of people talks about “(b)”, the victim G who was heard by it, and said that “A large number of people talks about her speech,” and the Defendant said that “A large number of people, who are not the same conditions, all of whom, anywhere, she is pulse, she will be fried,” and “A large number of friend friende, her age, and if so, she is friend h.,” while talking about four minutes with the victim, the Defendant said that “A large number of people are friende, friend, friend, and friend, friend, friend,” multiple times and repeated.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do148, Apr. 1, 2

arrow