logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.07.26 2018고단1584
폭행등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On February 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 01:08, at the center located above the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul; (b) around 82, when the Defendant and female passengers on whom the Defendant and the victim B (57 years old) were seated in the taxi, demanded a three-dimensional car fee in relation to where the Defendant and the female passengers were engaged in Gutoo in the taxi, whether the Defendant asked for the car car by asking whether it can be seen as ice gue in the taxi and the car.

C. The mae, maeee, knee, knee, was hnee-fele-fele-fele-fele-fele-fele-fele.

The Defendant continued to receive 112 reports and sent out to C, a policeman D, and a person in secret name, saying, “I am, Chewing gue, p.p. gue should be reported as a refusal to take passengers, and I am gue” to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim, and openly insultd the victim.

2. Of the above facts charged, the part of the assault is a crime stipulated in Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the part of the assault constitutes a crime of non-prosecution pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, and the part of insult is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only when a complaint is filed pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the injured person after the indictment of this case was instituted and expressed his/her intention not to hold the Defendant liable for the criminal liability. Thus, the prosecution against the accused is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow