logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2017.04.18 2016고정83
상해등
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of one million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the injured side of the defendant and the injured side of the family living in the village, such as the injured party C(74) and the injured party D(n, 71 years old) have been operating a private house in Nam-si E, and there has been disputes over the problem of the water play of the village valley provided to the private house guests.

1. In around 07:30 on August 9, 2016, the injured Defendant: (a) at the victim C’s house located in Namwon City F for the foregoing reasons, the injured Defendant: (b) expressed the victim’s bath while sustaining expenses for the said reasons; and (c) stated the victim’s finger in the drafting of the Defendant, who laid the victim’s fingers into the Defendant’s body; and (d) took the victim’s fingers into the victim’s fingers; and (e) took the victim’s fingers into the victim’s fingers for about 14 days, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, namely, “an open wound of fingers without any damage to the fingers, and two pages on the right side” that require treatment for about 14 days.

2. Definating;

A. The Defendant publicly insultingd the victim D for the same reason as the date and time set forth in paragraph 1 and at a place where G, which is a village principal, on the ground of the preceding paragraph.

B. On the same day as the preceding paragraph 09:30 on the day, the Defendant heard the I’s house located in H, Namwon-si, 09:30, and the victim C has disturbed the village.

The Bagical theory called the "comfort son," and the Bagical theory called the "Chewing" to the victim D, thereby openly insulting the victims.

[In the facts charged of this case, the defendant open to the victim D "poner"

멍멍 멍” 이라는 말도 했다고

in writing.

However, the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone that the defendant made such a statement.

It is difficult to readily conclude.

There is no evidence to prove otherwise.

Rather, in full view of the circumstances recognized by records, etc., the statement by the defendant is “I am.”

멍멍 멍” 일 가능성이 높아 보인다.

In addition, it is difficult to regard the horses themselves as a bath.

(2).

arrow