A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while operating the “D D D D D D D D,” in the Cheongdo-gun, Cheongwon-gun, Cheongwon-gun, around December 2013, is expected to open a large room of 201 in the Cheongwon-gun, Gangwon-do.

If investments are made, 50% of the profits will be paid.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not want to open a multilateral bank, and the defendant has a plan to use money as hospital expenses, living expenses, travel expenses, etc. by deceiving money from the defendant under the pretext of business investment funds.

Defendant 1, as above, was paid KRW 2,00,000,000 on August 2, 201 of the same month to Daegu Bank located in Masan-dong around January 10, 2014 from the victim of the damage, for investment, at the Daegu Bank located in Busan-si around around 10:00,000 and KRW 1,00,000,000 on one’s own check for investment, and KRW 2,00,000 around 23, 200,000 around the same month;

2.3. Around March 1, 200, KRW 2 million, KRW 1 million around the 4th of the same month, KRW 9 million around the 5th of the same month, KRW 8 million around the 10th of the same month, KRW 1.5 million around the 10th of the same month, KRW 5 million around the 12th of the same month, KRW 300,000 around the 18th of the same month, KRW 35,20 million over the 12th of the same month, and KRW 40,000 around the 20th of the same month, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the witness E in the protocol of examination of witness;

1. Statement in the police statement protocol against E;

1. Each description of a copy of account, internal investigation report (related to the submission of a detailed statement of account transactions), investigation report (related to the submission of a detailed statement of account transactions), investigation report (A) (the building owner and telephone communications of the place in which the defendant tried to do so) (the defendant wishes to live as a director to another area;

The defective victim was 15 million won to support the new director in 10,000 won. Further, the injured party only delivered 5 million won to the defendant under the name of living expenses, and the defendant did not receive a total of 35,20,000 won under the name of multiple investment as stated in the facts charged of this case, and the defendant deceivings the victim.