(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.07.17 2013고단1383

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.07.17 2013고단1383

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of official seal around March 2013 shall be acquitted.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around December 31, 2010, the Defendant made a proposal to the Mono-dong-dong Da to the effect that “A woman-friendly job offer victim D with whom it is difficult to know the trade name in the Gu-U.S. Si-S.,” that “A loan may be repaid to the Mano-dong with a loan of at least 6 million won, with a loan of at least 2-3 months, and with a loan of at least 2-3 months, he/she may be repaid with a loan of at least 24 million won.” On the other hand, the Defendant had the victim obtain a loan of 10 million won in the name of the victim from the Honam-gu Montreal Savings Bank in the name of the victim around the 31st of the same month, and around January 5, 2011, the victim at the home of the victim in the Daegu North Korean-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not think that he was operating a multilateral, and was willing to consume money for personal purposes such as living expenses with money from the victim.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received one million won in cash from the victim’s place of residence on the same day under the pretext of protection expenses in relation to the management of multiples from around the same day to around the 19th day of the same month, and received a total of 5 million won in cash, or transferred to the Defendant’s account, for a total of 12 times as indicated in the attached list of crimes in the same manner.

2. Around January 23, 2011, the Defendant demanded the Victim D to meet or pay money, but refused to offer no money that the victim would no longer have any more than the remaining money, and the Defendant, even so far as the amount was “the victim would have paid money to her, and would not have his/her parents back with her son.”

In addition, 1.5 million won is examined in the line on the front side and the money is collected from how to pay the end.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.11.27 2015고단617

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.01.16 2017고단706

-서울동부지방법원 2014.12.12 2014노1165

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2015.11.12 2015고단271

-광주지방법원 2019.06.27 2018고단2259 (1)