Defendants shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 16, 2015, from around 16:20 to 16:50 the same day, the Defendants who interfered with their business were paid attention to “E” coffee shop operated by the victim D located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “E”) and “humping so that they would be imprising,” and Defendant A was able to receive attention from the employees.

his consideration and d, whether it will pay a coffee value, and whether it will do so.

“Plusium,” and Defendant B’s next table customers “the age is the same, h, h, and h.h., several times to the next table customers.”

“Along with the great interest of “satisfy,” thereby allowing customers who were in the coffee shop.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the coffee business of the victimized person by force.

2. From November 16, 2015, the Defendants, at the above “E” coffee shop, who interfered with the performance of official duties, were required to return home from Ha, who was dispatched after receiving a report from 112.

Nevertheless, there is a defect that the above police officer attempted to arrest the Defendants as a current offender interfering with the duties of the Defendants, Defendant B expressed the desire to see “hing police Chewing,” and Defendant A pushed the H’s chest with her hand, and Defendant A was “hing off.”

“Along with sound,” the breast part of G was pushed down by hand.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the above police at the same time interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business) and Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with the performance of official duties);

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who choose the punishment: each of them shall be punished by a fine.