Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 28, 2015, Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant found the victim’s “D” in the context of “D”, which was located in Busan Sho-gu, Busan, for the reason that the victim’s coffee did not bring about a coffee ordered by the victim E. However, Defendant A was not aware that the victim would have a coffee.

Nice president, the president of Nice president, the president of the president of the Republic of Korea, but the president of the Republic of Korea did not set up a so-called “satisfy,” and returned to the table table, and discarded the dispute containing coffee and water into the bottom, and thereby obstructing the victim’s coffee sales business by force of 20 minutes.

2. On October 28, 2015, Defendant A and Defendant B were arrested as a flagrant offender G through the F District Police Station G, which was called out to be a suspicion of interference with the business as set forth in paragraph (1) above, around October 28, 2015.

Accordingly, Defendant A, who refused to comply with the principle of no taxation and assessment of tax base of the Republic of Korea, committed assault, such as frighting the arms he was catched by the above G, frighting the chest, and Defendant B, frighting the arms of the above G, frighting the shoulder part, and frighting the shoulder part.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of the above G flagrant offender.

3. Defendant B’s sole criminal act around October 28, 2015: (a) around 21:45, the Defendant received a report from other customers on the place of the pertinent D coffee shop and heard the circumstances of damage; and (b) received the report and received the report from other customers; and (c) received the report and received the report, to Defendant B’s victim H.

“Publicly insulting the victim.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to E, G, H, and I;

1. A complaint;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (referring to the statement made by the person concerned, etc.);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 314(1) (a) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) and 30 (a) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 30 (a) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment, respectively,

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act.