logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.12 2015구합69523
손실보상금
Text

1. The Defendant: 17,907,400 won to Plaintiff A; 126,58,690 won to Plaintiff B; 16,229,000 won to Plaintiff C; and 13.

Reasons

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) project approval and public notice - Public housing project (I; hereinafter “instant project”): Defendant: J/L published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 26, 2010, K published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on October 14, 2014 - Project operator:

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on February 26, 2015 (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”) - Land subject to expropriation: The phrase “land subject to expropriation” is indicated in the attached Table.

(hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case” and the individual land shall be specified only with its lot number) - Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the statement in the form of “adjudication amount for expropriation” as shown in the attached Table.

- The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on April 21, 2015 - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation; a future new appraisal corporation (Plaintiff A); a dialogue appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal of expropriation”) (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal of expropriation”): As regards the land owned by the Plaintiff A, the land owned by Plaintiff D, the NN land owned by Plaintiff H, and the land owned by Plaintiff H, the appraised value should be calculated by reflecting waste disposal costs and other conditions in a way that reflects the disposal costs and other conditions.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on September 17, 2015 (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) - Contents of the ruling: The dismissal of Plaintiff H’s objection, the remainder of the Plaintiffs’ compensation increase - Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the statement in the attached Table.

- An appraisal corporation: the uniform appraisal corporation, the Korea Appraisal Corporation (Plaintiff A), the future appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Objectioned Appraisal”) - The appraisal content: As regards the L land owned by the Plaintiff, the M land owned by the Plaintiff D, the N land owned by the Plaintiff H, and the N land andO land owned by the Plaintiff H, the appraised value should be calculated by reflecting waste disposal costs and other conditions.

D. The result of the commission of appraisal by the appraiser P of this Court (hereinafter “court appraiser”) and the result of the commission of appraisal supplementation, January 24, 2017.

arrow