logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.19 2015구합69684
손실보상금 감액청구
Text

1. As to each land indicated in the “land subject to accommodation” in the attached Table 1 list against Defendant A.

Reasons

1. Circumstances and results of the appraisal;

A. The Defendants are owners of each land indicated in the “land subject to accommodation” column in the attached Table 1 list (hereinafter “each land of this case” and its lot number alone).

The construction waste (hereinafter “instant waste”) is buried on the D land, E land, F land, F land owned by Defendant B, G land owned by Defendant C, and H land, and construction waste is buried under the H land owned by Defendant A. The disposal cost is as indicated in the “waste disposal cost” in the attached Table 1 list.

(b) Project approval and public announcement - Project name: Public announcement - Public announcement of the public sewerage installation project in Namyang-si on March 7, 2013 - Project implementer - Plaintiff:

C. The ruling of expropriation by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on October 27, 2014 (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”): Each land of this case - Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the statement in the column of “the amount of adjudication of expropriation” in the attached list 1.

- Commencement date of expropriation: - An appraisal corporation on November 26, 2014 - An appraisal corporation: two appraisal corporations, one appraisal corporation;

D. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on September 17, 2015 (hereinafter “instant objection”): Plaintiff and Defendants - Compensation object: Each of the land in the instant case - Compensation object: The same shall apply to the statement in the column for “the amount of the objection” in the attached list 1.

(1) The Plaintiff asserted that the disposal costs of the instant wastes, which were buried underground, should be reflected in the evaluation of the value of each of the instant land. However, the Plaintiff’s above assertion was not accepted) - An appraisal corporation: a virtualized appraisal corporation and a Sam Chang Chang-si appraisal corporation

E. The result of the commission of the appraiserJ to the appraiser J in the lawsuit claiming the increase of compensation for losses (U.S. District Court 2015Guhap69622) filed by the Defendants (hereinafter referred to as “court appraiser”) - The result of the commission of appraisal is referred to as “court appraisal”: the amount of compensation for each land of this case - the content of appraisal.

arrow