1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and a fine of three million won for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; on August 10, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for larceny by the same court on September 5, 2012; on September 11, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for larceny by the vice branch of the Daegu District Court; on October 9, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for larceny by the Daegu District Court as a fine of three million won for larceny; and on May 9, 2013, the Daegu District Court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) and a fine of three hundred thousand won for a fine by the Daegu District Court.

1. Around 07:00 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) laid down one of the 70,000 Manle lid (50cm wide, 32cm long) at the market price owned by the north-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, which was installed on the three-road side of the road; (b) brought about a bicycle to bring about a theft. On June 10, 2015, the Defendant: (c) around 07:15, on June 10, 2015, brought about a theft of one bicycle at the end of 76:0,000 won in the market price owned by the North-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, which was installed on the three-road side of the road; (d) the Defendant habitually stolen one bicycle at the volume of 140,000 won in total (50cm wide, 320,000 square meters in total).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (Attachment to suspect rulings);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the continuous repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the custody of a workhouse, served 20 persons with the same career as those who have served in the same kind of crime, and released them on November 18, 2014.