A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 22, 2015, at around 23:20, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against D, which was reported by the 112-person who was a scam of the scam, on the roads B in Ansan-si, Ansan-si; and (b) committed assault, such as plucking, plucking, plucking, etc. of G police officers, who carried the Defendant’s arms in order to avoid these acts, by arresting the flagrant offender from the slope F, belonging to the E-gu, the Ansan-gu Police Station E-gu, the Ansan-gu, the Ansan-si, the scambling of G, who was called up.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning public peace and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of statutes on video data related to the case

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of recommendations shall be limited to the category 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties) and the basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) (special person) of the same category;

2. Normal circumstances favorable to the decision of sentence: The age, character and conduct, environment, details of the instant crime and circumstances after the crime, etc. are committed, which are contrary to the unfavorable circumstances: The crime is committed.