1. Upon a request of the plaintiff who has been extended or reduced in the trial, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The 3rd page 5 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be the same as the 3rd page 5 of the judgment of the first instance.

On the 6th 9th 9th 1st am of the first instance judgment, the "ratio of the plaintiff's negligence" has been added to "the ratio of the plaintiff's liability (25% considering the situation of the Dong-ho and the negligence of the safe labelling)".

The "statement of calculation of the amount of damages" in part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be replaced by the six pages of the judgment.

Part 5 to 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance is 2,197,404 won per month (=9,882 won x 22 days). The daily wage of the urban ordinary person at the time of the closure of the argument in this case was 2,197,404.”

Each "physical disability" of the 5th and 16th of the judgment of the first instance court shall be written with "physical disability".

The 6th two to three pages of the judgment of the first instance court shall be followed as follows.

[B] W. W. W. W. W. W. W. W. W. W. W. W. W. W. W. W. 158,10 won (the Plaintiff’s admission fee of KRW 400,000 paid at the Plaintiff’s own expense appears to be a higher-ranking hospital fee. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that there was a need for the Plaintiff to inevitably transfer to a higher-class hospital due to the risk of infection, etc., and thus, there is no need to receive medical treatment. Accordingly, the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to be a damage in proximate causal relation with the instant accident, and thus,

) On the 6th 5th th th eth son of the first instance judgment, the “this case’s closing of argument” shall be applied to “the closing of argument in the trial.”

The 6th 16th 18th 10th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 10.

"In the absence of dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries and images of evidence A, A, 5, 6, 8, 15, 18, 19, B, 11, and 11, the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the head of the Korea National University within the Korea National University, the significant facts, and all pleadings.