beta
Text
1. The plaintiff A, including the plaintiff's claim extended in the trial of the court of first instance, is against the plaintiff A in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance.
Reasons
1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The phrase "statement of calculation of the amount of damages" in Section 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be replaced by that of Section 7 of the judgment.
The following shall be added to the five pages of the fifth decision of the first instance:
[C. Da. Hahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
The fifth page of the judgment of the first instance shall be replaced by the following table:
From 6th to 12th of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall apply:
In the absence of dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 5 through 12, 21, 23, Eul's evidence Nos. 1 and 2, each evidence No. 1 and 2, each of the results of the commission of physical examination to the head of the Katol University Seoul Hospital and the results of the inquiry into the fact, the results of the inquiry into the head of the Han River University (U.S.) Han River University (U.S.), the results of the inquiry into the head of the Han River University (U.S.) Han River University (U.S.) and the purport of the entire pleadings, the first instance
Therefore, the Defendant’s lawsuit is based on the following facts: KRW 172,674,117 (i.e., property damage KRW 150,674,117) and KRW 163,94,175, which was cited by the first instance court among them, as to KRW 22,00,000, and KRW 163,94,175, which was the date of the instant accident.