1. The Plaintiff:

A. The development of the main industry by the defendant limited liability company is 604,355,646 won and 59,520,800 won among them.

In light of the fact that separate remuneration costs of KRW 4,747,772 are calculated in Category 5, there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that only the result of the appraisal constitutes a defect in the reverse back of the bathing room. There is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

2) The Defendants’ rejection of the Defendants’ assertion as to the defect in each of the items indicated below is alleged as indicated in the “main text” column, but this part of the Defendants’ assertion cannot be accepted in light of the circumstances as indicated in the “judgment”. The main point of the Defendants’ assertion is not the door for free access of residents, but the entrance of the PIT story is installed at a height of 700 meters from the floor to the point of internal inspection, which is installed at a height of 700 meters from the floor, and there is no marking marking on the design drawing. Although the PIT story’s window head is constructed differently from the construction drawing of the PIT story (520*3010), it cannot be readily concluded that the construction cost of the PIT story’s installation is less than the construction drawing and the construction cost of the PIT story’s installation should not be modified to the extent that the construction cost of the PIT story’s installation is not likely to hinder the entry and exit. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that there is no other evidence that the construction cost of the PIT story’s is less than the construction cost.