1. The application for participation by the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) and supplementary defendant shall be dismissed;

2. Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) Co., Ltd.

A. In light of the fact that the appraiser, as a result of a sprinking with the wall, has constructed an additional construction on the part where the sprinking was caused by the sprinking with the wall, but the said sprinking was not sufficient, it is deemed that the said part was a defect in the construction, in view of the fact that the repair cost is calculated for the part where the sprinking was insufficient. Accordingly, it is reasonable to view that the said part is a defect in the construction.

In consideration of the fact, it should be taken into account at the limitation of liability.

B) The main cause of the defect of the Doralar related (15th appraisal) is due to the lack of length to the height with the container. According to the detailed contents of the completion drawings of this case, the Doralar's Doralar's Doralar's Doralar's Doralar's 2040m width * 3500m in length * 600-700m in height * 3040m in height * 300m in length * 350m in height * 350m in height * 70m in length * 70m in height * 350m in construction. Thus, the construction of the defendant's Dora is not liable for the defect in this part * 20m 110m in front 16m in appraisal and appraisal as a result of the appraisal of the appraiser's 3m in front 16m in height 16m in this case* 3m in front 16m in appraisal and appraisal.216m in this part.