logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.29 2012가합105739
손해배상 등
Text

1. Of each lawsuit against Defendant Dongdong Construction Co., Ltd. and D Cases Construction Co., Ltd., the following order 2.

Reasons

(a) asserts that they will assume responsibility for nonperformance;

In addition to the construction completion drawings of item 12-1 rooftop floor finishing works (originally constructed), HK 60 non-construction 60 non-permanent concrete non-construction 6,614,479 public use 12-2 12-2 studal studal string 5,103,032 public 12-3 studal 239,88 public 12-4 239,88 public 12-4 239,725,013 public 12-5, 600 97 97 97 97 12-5 294 294 7 5 294 25 7 94 72 5 94 7 5 94 5 16 16 5 7 92 5 5 7 5 5 92 16 5 162 94 16 16 7 9

1. The defendants asserted that the defect in the whole oil 13-1) is a defect separate from the starting drawing. The defendants argued that the defect in the newly constructed apartment is not a defect in the aggregate of 166,671,051 won of the defect repair cost of the items constructed differently from the starting drawing. The new apartment is considered to be a defect without dispute as to items 13-1 of the above whole apartment. (b) The term "new apartment" generally completed apartment is an incomplete part in light of the contents of the contract, such as reducing the value or exchange value of the apartment differently from the contents of the contract for construction, or failing to meet the requirements of the parties.

arrow