logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.08.14 2014고단2282
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In order to stabilize the housing of homeless workers, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport operates a system of lending the worker deposit funds at a rate lower than the market interest rate without securing the worker deposit funds. C. D, by taking advantage of the fact that only submission of the documents related to the loan-related business to the financial institution entrusted with the loan can easily obtain the loan through a formal examination if only the house deposit contract is submitted, the defendant and the employed-related documents introduced from his or her name in a false manner and the house deposit contract, etc. are submitted to the financial institution, and E is offered to have the loan and divide them by borrowing the worker deposit funds from the financial institution, and E provides the name of the (F)F business operator necessary to make the false documents for receiving the payment from C, and G is expected to receive the payment from D, and prepares a false house deposit contract.

C On February 208, 2008, upon the public invitation as above, the Defendant made false employed documents, such as a certificate of employment under the name of “(D) F Representative E” with the content that the Defendant was an employee of “(D)F,” although the Defendant did not have been employed as an employee in “(DF)F,” and around that time, at the I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, the Plaintiff prepared a false real estate lease agreement with the Defendant, D, 60 million won, Ga, and Lessee.

On February 2, 2008, C moved to the Defendant at the Central Branch of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Youngpo-dong 4, Youngpo-gu, Youngpo-gu, Seoul. The Defendant applied for a loan of 30 million won to an employee in charge of loan in the name of the above bank, and the Defendant has worked for the “StateF” without any intention to lease a house in accordance with the terms of the above lease contract.

arrow