The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant, at the time and place recorded in the facts constituting the crime as indicated in the judgment below, did not steals two punishments against the victim Nos. D (hereinafter “victims”). However, the lower court convicted the Defendant of the facts constituting the instant case by misunderstanding the facts.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined at the court below, i.e., (1) the victim D was placed in the large room of the place indicated in the facts constituting the crime (hereinafter “the instant accommodation”) around May 10, 2014, and confirmed that the damaged goods of this case are kept in the kitchen as they were, around August 7, 2014,. (2) The instant accommodation was used as an employee’s accommodation in “I”; (3) the Defendant and the victim had been living in the instant accommodation before the victim resided in the instant accommodation; (4) the victim was not in possession of the key to the instant suit at the time of the instant accommodation, and (4) the Defendant had been able to use the instant accommodation at the time of 0 days before the victim’s accommodation, and (4) the victim was not in possession of the key to the instant accommodation at the time of the instant accommodation, and (3) the Defendant was able to use the instant accommodation at the time of 10th of August 20, 2019.